[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Nathan Roberts moved YARN-4964 to MAPREDUCE-6678:
-------------------------------------------------

    Affects Version/s:     (was: 2.7.2)
                           (was: 3.0.0)
                       3.0.0
                       2.7.2
     Target Version/s:   (was: 3.0.0, 2.9.0)
          Component/s:     (was: nodemanager)
                       nodemanager
                  Key: MAPREDUCE-6678  (was: YARN-4964)
              Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce  (was: Hadoop YARN)

> Allow ShuffleHandler readahead without drop-behind
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAPREDUCE-6678
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6678
>             Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: nodemanager
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.2, 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Nathan Roberts
>            Assignee: Nathan Roberts
>         Attachments: YARN-4964.001.patch
>
>
> Currently mapreduce.shuffle.manage.os.cache enables/disables both readahead 
> (POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED) and drop-behind (POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED) logic within the 
> ShuffleHandler.
> It would be beneficial if these were separately configurable. 
> - Running without readahead can lead to significant seek storms caused by 
> large numbers of sendfiles() competing with one another.
> - However, running with drop-behind can also lead to seek storms because 
> there are cases where the server can successfully write the shuffle bytes to 
> the network, BUT the client doesn't want the bytes right now (MergeManager 
> wants to WAIT is an example) so it ignores them and asks for them again a bit 
> later. This causes repeated reads of the same data from disk.
> I'll attach a simple patch that enables/disables readahead based on 
> mapreduce.shuffle.readahead.bytes==0, leaving 
> mapreduce.shuffle.manage.os.cache controlling only the drop-behind.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to