On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Hong Tang <[email protected]> wrote:
> You mean this: > http://code.google.com/p/hadoop-gpl-compression/issues/detail?id=17? > > That and I think a couple others Kevin has found - I'll let him jump in with details. > Based on the description, the bug affects LzopCompressor, and should have > no impact on the packaging part, right? > > Right, but I didn't want to have to maintain patches in both places as I fix bugs, etc. So keeping it external is handy. External packaging repositories are also somewhat the norm in debian world - the only source trees that are supposed to have their own debian/ directory are so-called "Debian native" packages, where the version number and the debian release are one and the same (eg debian system scripts, etc) -Todd > On Oct 23, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > I would, except currently the github project seems to have some bug fixes > not in the google code one. I wanted to keep it external so it could apply > to either one. > > What's the story on merging the two projects? (Kevin's and the G Code one) > > -Todd > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Owen O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Oct 23, 2009, at 1:56 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: >> >> Hey Zheng, >> >> To get Kevin Weil's updated LZO work in a nice RPM or DEB package, check >> out http://github.com/toddlipcon/hadoop-lzo-packager. >> >> >> Could Todd submit the packaging stuff as a patch to >> >> http://code.google.com/p/hadoop-gpl-compression/ >> >> rather than having a side project that just packages the >> hadoop-gpl-compression project? >> >> -- Owen >> > > >
