CombineFileInputFormat should help with doing some locality, but it would not be as perfect as having the file loaded to the HDFS itself with a 1 GB block size (block sizes are per file properties, not global ones). You may consider that as an alternative approach.
I do not get (ii). I meant by my last sentence the same thing I've explained just above here. If your block size is 64 MB, and your request splits of 1 GB (via plain FileInputFormat), then even the 64 MB read can't be guaranteed local (theoretically speaking). On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Mapred Learn <mapred.le...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Harsh, > Thanks ! > i) I was currently doing it by extending CombineFileInputFormat and > specifying -Dmapred.max.split.size but this increases job finish time by > about 3 times. > ii) since you said this file output size is going to be greater than block > size in this case. What happens in case when people have input split of say > 1 Gb and map-red output is produced as 400 MB. In this case also, size is > greater than block size ? Or did you mean that since mapper will get > multiple input files as input split, the data input to mapper won't be local > ? > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote: >> >> Mapred, >> >> This should be doable if you are using TextInputFormat (or other >> FileInputFormat derivatives that do not override getSplits() >> behaviors). >> >> Try this: >> jobConf.setLong("mapred.min.split.size", <byte size you want each >> mapper split to try to contain, i.e. 1 GB in bytes (long)>); >> >> This would get you splits worth the size you mention, 1 GB or else, >> and you should have outputs fairly near to 1 GB when you do the >> sequence file conversion (lower at times due to serialization and >> compression being applied). You can play around with the parameter >> until the results are satisfactory. >> >> Note: Tasks would no longer be perfectly data local since you're >> requesting much > block size perhaps. >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Mapred Learn <mapred.le...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > I have a use case where I want to process data and generate seq file >> > output >> > of fixed size , say 1 GB i.e. each map-reduce job output should be 1 Gb. >> > >> > Does anybody know of any -D option or any other way to achieve this ? >> > >> > -Thanks JJ >> >> >> >> -- >> Harsh J > > -- Harsh J