Hi Marcin, Marcin Cieslak wrote: > Ah, I forgot one things. > > I'd like to see how IP failover may work for us in practice (I am > thinking between easy switch between ptolemy and cassini in case of some > PostgreSQL problems). > > (10) Do you mind allocating us one more virtual IPv4 address that will > be shared between cassini and ptolemy (for now)? This leads up to:
I addressed this in my previous mail. > (11) I would like to use generate multicast traffic between OSM servers. > I think it would be good to have few IP addresses from the > 239.192.0.0/14 range allocated. Well... we do use multicast a bit. We can indeed allocate IPs for you, out of our AS-allocated range. However, Switches/routers handle multicast traffic specially, have group/port membership limits for them and we've also found several bugs. So before you start using it heavily, I'd like to know what for. :) With only 2 servers communicating, would unicast not be a better idea? Let me know, -- Mark Bergsma <[email protected]> System & Network Administrator, Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ Maps-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/maps-l
