Am 26.11.2010 09:32, schrieb Thomas Ineichen: > On a side note: > bw-noicons needs double the time for rendering as osm-no-lables - > shouldn't they be more-a-less equal in cpu-time? Yes I also had the feeling that the bw styles need very long to render but I don't have any idea why.
> [The following is only about 'full'-styles] > > Looking at Zoom 12: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.4592&lon=10.9644&zoom=12&layers=M > > Do we really need a weekly update on that zoom? What you can see is: > - main streets (secondary and up) and trains > - forests and fields > - names of villages and cities > > IMHO those things don't change often enough to let them jam the queue. > Rendering them once a month would be ok. The dirty plans (which zoom and when) were wrong, I see that now. Currently I'm re-marking every tile in z0-12 as clean. I want the tirex to catch up again. Then we can discuss how to go on for that. Kai Krueger has found some issues with the dirty section in the load-next script as well. I don't have time to work on these things but as osm is a MMP this should not be a problem ;) > Secondly: > Is it correct, that tiles never get deleted? So every tile gets > rerendered according to the timetable, no matter if it was requested > from a user during that period or not? So maybe a deletion strategy > would be handy.. Deleting is remove any fallback. Deleting a tile is never a solution. We don't render tiles after the timetable (except z0-6) but mark them as dirty. They'll get rerendered when accessed next time via mod_tile (while mod_tile serves out the old tile from disk). Peter _______________________________________________ Maps-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/maps-l
