What I dont understand is this: if the license is not good enough for osm, why is it not good enough for wikipedia? If the license is broken, why dont the authors of the license fix it so all projects benefit.
it is all confusing for me. mike On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Samuel Klein <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Kai Krueger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Sorry for all the questions, but I was curious to hear how people see > > the current status and its future. If there are any wiki pages, talks or > > other material about the current status of the OSM wikipedia integration > > I'd be thankful for any further links as well. > > I'm curious too. Has there been any discussion of how the change in > OSM license will affect integration? Are there any Wikipedia ---> OSM > information-sharing scripts that may break as a result? > > SJ > > _______________________________________________ > Maps-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/maps-l > -- James Michael DuPont Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova and Albania flossk.org flossal.org
_______________________________________________ Maps-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/maps-l
