Le 2016-11-05, Yuri Astrakhan a écrit :
> Guillaume and Federico, thanks! I might have been too generic :) Basically
> I would like to get a general feel for
> 
> * are we enabling new content-oriented (no impact until editors add it to
> the pages) features too fast or too slow? And that mostly means maps -
> should we make maps absolutely perfect before giving it into the hands of
> the community?
> 
> * should we enable new features earlier, in a more unfinished state, so
> that community can comment on things earlier, and possibly tell us if we
> are going in the wrong direction?  Or should we release them later, so new
> features are more polished from the start, but possibly less needed (miss
> the mark) and would require considerable resources to rework?
> 

As a (little) contributor, I would like to have more frequent, little increases
and new features, (RERO 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Release_early,_release_often).
But I can't speak from a reader-only point of view.


BTW, I was thrilled to have Kartographer/maplink available in Wikipedia 2 
months ago, 
and I had a little burst of propaganda endeavour concerning this feature, with 
a little blog post(1) in french and some talk on WP project pages which could 
use it
(mainly monuments and natural preservation areas).
I'd like to know if there is a way to list all the pages using maplink/mapframe
on a version of Wikipedia, to help figure out the popularity of the feature, and
its evolution.


(1) 
https://gallaxie.wordpress.com/2016/09/21/wikipedia-wikidata-et-openstreetmap/

-- 
° /\   Guillaume Allègre            OpenStreetMap France  
http://www.openstreetmap.fr
 /~~\/\  [email protected]  Wikipédia Wiktionnaire Wikimédia-Commons 
Wikidata
/   /~~\   tél. 04.76.63.26.99      Des contenus partagés libres et 
collaboratifs


_______________________________________________
Maps-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/maps-l

Reply via email to