I don’t remember offhand and will have to check. That said if there is a
attribute level token in a layer level expression than that would explain
your research. Is there really no way to get info on the expression(s) in
question?

On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 9:22 AM Tamas Szekeres <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm not too familiar in the current parser/lexer implementation, but is
> msTokenizeExpression and yyparse supposed to be protected by the same
> parser lock in msEvalContext? Or if  msTokenizeExpression doesn't leave
> any global variables behind, should yyparse be protected by it's own?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tamas
>
>
> Steve Lime <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2022. febr. 19., Szo,
> 16:02):
>
>> Requires and labelrequires aren’t operating at the feature level, rather
>> the layer level so they definitely don’t support attribute binding. We’d
>> need to whip up a test case to figure out a method to trap this. The
>> workaround is to fix the expression. I mean, obviously we don’t want to
>> crash but it’s never going to work if written as you suspect.
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 7:55 AM Tamas Szekeres <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Devs,
>>>
>>> I got a crash log which shows that the access violation is happening in
>>> the following location:
>>>
>>> *mapserver!yylex+0x1b5 
>>> [e:\builds-t1\src\mapserver-intramaps\vc15x64\mapparser.y @ 858]
>>>             mapserver!yyparse+0x247 
>>> [e:\home\even\mapserver\mapserver\mapparser.c @ 1461]
>>>             mapserver!msEvalContext+0x178 
>>> [e:\builds-t1\src\mapserver-intramaps\maputil.c @ 442]
>>>             mapserver!msDrawVectorLayer+0xb0 
>>> [e:\builds-t1\src\mapserver-intramaps\mapdraw.c @ 918]
>>>             mapserver!msDrawLayer+0x3a3 
>>> [e:\builds-t1\src\mapserver-intramaps\mapdraw.c @ 813]
>>>             mapserver!msDrawMap+0x415 
>>> [e:\builds-t1\src\mapserver-intramaps\mapdraw.c @ 403]
>>>             mapscript!CSharp_mapObj_draw+0xd*
>>>
>>> By looking into the corresponding code, the problem has happened in the
>>> following location in yylex():
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * case MS_TOKEN_BINDING_INTEGER:    token = NUMBER; ---->   (*lvalp).dblval 
>>> = atof(p->shape->values[p->expr->curtoken->tokenval.bindval.index]);    
>>> break;*
>>>
>>> In maputil.c the call stack location is here (msEvalContext):
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *msTokenizeExpression(&e, NULL, NULL);  p.shape = NULL;  p.expr = &e;  
>>> p.expr->curtoken = p.expr->tokens; /* reset */  p.type = 
>>> MS_PARSE_TYPE_BOOLEAN;----->  status = yyparse(&p);  msFreeExpression(&e);*
>>>
>>> And in mapdraw.c
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * /* TODO TBT: draw as raster layer in vector renderers */----->  annotate 
>>> = msEvalContext(map, layer, layer->labelrequires);  if(map->scaledenom > 0) 
>>> {    if((layer->labelmaxscaledenom != -1) && (map->scaledenom >= 
>>> layer->labelmaxscaledenom)) annotate = MS_FALSE;    
>>> if((layer->labelminscaledenom != -1) && (map->scaledenom < 
>>> layer->labelminscaledenom)) annotate = MS_FALSE;  }*
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if the LABELREQUIRES option supports attribute binding
>>> (probably not) and in that case the
>>> p->expr->curtoken->tokenval.bindval.index would probably have undefined
>>> value. I don't have any information about the corresponding LABELREQUIRES
>>> expression , but if I assume it doesn't contain attribute binding, then
>>> this crash might probably happen due to a missing parser lock around 
>>> *yyparse(&p).
>>> *What do you think about the problem and how could we work around this?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Tamas
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MapServer-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>>>
>>
_______________________________________________
MapServer-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev

Reply via email to