Hi,
When I was reading the old bug reports in the OSGeo code sprint this 20 years
old one https://github.com/MapServer/MapServer/issues/408 from year 2003 did
not feel rotten at all. And the last comment
https://github.com/MapServer/MapServer/issues/408#issuecomment-1065080140 has
received 5 thumbs up within 1 year which shows great user activity by our
standards.
I think that environmental variables may be too strong tool for this purpose.
For example, are those who write mapfiles allowed to set env variables in
managed environments? Maybe something similar to SYMBOLSET and INCLUDE would be
easier to use.
As an example, I found a pretty good bug report that includes a mapfile and
data, but for testing the mapfile on my Windows machine I need to make a few
edits.
CONFIG "PROJ_LIB" "/usr/local/share/proj"
I am on Windows and my proj is in some other place
WMS_ONLINERESOURCE http://odroid1:5001/
wms_service_onlineresource http://odroid1:5001/
I don't understand the difference between those two,
but anyway I run Mapserver at http://localhost:8060/...
DATA "./bug-report.xml"
I prefer to keep data in different place than mapfiles
DATA "./data-in-31287"
Same for this shapefile data
What if we could write non-fixed paths and other items into the mapfile like
CONFIG "PROJ_LIB" "%proj_lib%"
WMS_ONLINERESOURCE "%onlineresource_test%"
wms_service_onlineresource "%onlineresource_test%"
DATA "%datapath_test%/bug-report.xml"
DATA "%datapath_test%/data-in-31287"
....
MAPVARIABLES "map_variables.txt"
END # mapfile
The contents of "map_variables.txt"
//Some magic
proj_lib [value]
onlineresource_test [value]
onlineresource_qa [value]
onlineresourse_production [value]
datapath_test [value]
datapath_qa [value]
datapath_production [value]
symbolset_topomap [value]
symbolset_citymap [value]
etc.
A difference to INCLUDE is that while the whole include file is slipped inside
the mapfile the variable file could be a dictionary. That would allow
forwarding the mapfile from test to qa to production easily. And when the IP
address of test servers change an edit in one place would be enough. It would
still be possible to use separate "map_variables_testing.txt" for testing if it
feels better.
I admit that there are alternative scenarios via INCLUDE or config file or
environmental variables.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
_______________________________________________
MapServer-dev mailing list
MapServer-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
