Hi! Thanks! I will do a new build tomorrow. I really appreciate the quick response.
Regards, Pål Kristensen Kralidis,Tom [Burlington] wrote: > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >> Pål Kristensen >> Sent: 26 February, 2008 3:56 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [MAPSERVER-USERS] WMS - GetCapabilities and version >> >> >> Hi! >> >> I did a build of mapserver nightly this evening and noticed >> some changed WMS behavior compared to my last build (approx 2 >> months ago). The old build does reply to at GetCapabilities >> request that misses the version parameter with a version >> 1.1.1 capabilities xml-file. The new build fails withe an >> error message that says that the version parameter is >> missing. According to the WMS 1.1.1 standard version is a >> mandatory parameter so the new behavior is correct according >> to the standard. Unfortunately many of the clients around do >> not comply with the standard, and of course the server gets the blame. >> >> I guess this issue fall into the ongoing compliance >> discussion (RFC-35). But what has changed over the last >> couple of month that introduced this new behavior, and is >> there some keywords that can be set to achieve the old behavior? > > Fixed. http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/2528 Thanks for catching > this. > > ..Tom > _______________________________________________ > mapserver-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/WMS---GetCapabilities-and-version-tp15699789p15714611.html Sent from the Mapserver - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
