Hi Sarel,

please cc the list since it might be useful for other people searching the archives one day.

1) AFAIK WMS server does not generate any images in the temp dir when using Mapserver in CGI mode. The WMS client in Mapserver does (so if you use remote WMS layers). I don't think WFS and WCS server store temporary images, but WFS client will store the file.

2) yes, you can use the same MAP file, see the OGC web services workshop.

3) it is not different, it just means the output format differs (so GML for WFS instead of e.g. image/png for WMS), the source data can be the same.

4) I am unaware of any KML support in Mapserver at the moment.

Best regards,
Bart

Sarel Coetzer wrote:

Thanks for the help Bart

Yes, I do have some questions.

- WMS creates a lot of images in my temp folder (I have a batch files cleaning this out regularly ), does WCS/WFS create any temp images?

-          Would one mapfile be able to host all tree services?

- For my MS WMS am thinking about using the FWTools to export my postGIS layers from server to client (clients format choice shpfile,mapinfo or kml), how would WCS or WFS handle this differently?

- Last one (sorry!) What type of service does KMLMapsever require, I have tried spitting out KML but I get an error in Google earth saying it has lost the network connection.

Many thanks


Regards
Sarel



On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Bart van den Eijnden (OSGIS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    Hi Sarel,

    I can probably explain it in a few sentences.

    WMS is a web mapping service, so it is meant to render an image of
    data, be it vector or raster data. It only gives you back an image
    representation of your data.
    WFS is a web feature service, it is meant to deliver the features
    (in vector format) to the client, so the "raw" data. The vector
    format is mostly GML (Geography Markup Language).
    WCS is a web coverage service, it is the raster version of WFS, so
    to deliver raster coverages in a "raw" format to the client.

    If you only need images and a query on a point click, stick with
    WMS. If you need your users to actually download data, you will
    need WFS + WCS.

    There is also a thing called SLD WMS (Styled Layer Descriptor),
    where the WMS client can change the symbology of the map, and get
    an image back in different colors/patterns etc. than the default
    one advertized by the service.

    Hope this helps. If you have further specific questions, don't
    hesitate to ask.

    Best regards,
    Bart

    Sarel Coetzer wrote:

        Hi

        Is there anywhere a brief explanation of the deferent types of
        map services such as WFS, WMS and WCS.
        What each service does differently then the other and how to
        identify which one would be the correct service to use for a
        specific application.
        I have read the various how to's on the wiki but I am trying
        to find a one page comparison of capabilities/advantages or
        disadvantages of these various services.


        Regards
        Sarel

        Regards
        Sarel

-- "http://sarelgis.blogspot.com/";
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------

        _______________________________________________
        mapserver-users mailing list

        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users


-- Bart van den Eijnden
    OSGIS, Open Source GIS
    [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    http://www.osgis.nl




--
"http://sarelgis.blogspot.com/";


--
Bart van den Eijnden
OSGIS, Open Source GIS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osgis.nl

_______________________________________________
mapserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users

Reply via email to