Manipulation of parameters that don't go through some validation as part of 
parsing (e.g. most strings)
is not supported in 5.0 and 5.2. The exceptions are data and template IF 
datapattern and templatepattern
are set. I've realized this change is probably too limiting and intended to 
remedy for 5.4. Look for an RFC
on the topic soon.

Steve

>>> Jeff McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08/19/08 12:55 AM >>>
hmm, u might also refer to the 5.0 migration guide, in case it helps 
you: 
http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/browser/branches/branch-5-0/mapserver/MIGRATION_GUIDE.TXT

I have also seen a variation of this error: 
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/2008-May/055877.html


-- 
Jeff McKenna
FOSS4G Consulting and Training Services
http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/




Jefferson Bauer wrote:
> Hello
> 
> I was upgrading my
> mapserver from 4.6 to 5.2 (using MS4W v2.2.8 ) and everything was ok
> utntil i run a function that change the name of a CLASS by URL. My
> mapfile have a layer like:
> 
> LAYER 
>    
> NAME    municipio
>     ... 
>    
> CLASS
>         NAME   
> "sedes"
>         ...
>    
> END 
> END
> 
> I'm using mapserver as
> CGI and to do the change in 4.6 i use this:
> &map_municipio_sedes_name=newname
> 
> Now in 5.2 i read this
> article:
> http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/docs/reference/cgi/referencemanual-all-pages
> 
> So, the new way to do
> what i want must be something
> like:
> &map_layer[municipio]_class[sedes]_name=newname
> or
> &map_layer[0]_class[0]_name=newname
> 
> But it's not working... I receive this error: 
> 
> loadClass(): Unknown identifier. Parsing error near (name):(line 1) 
> 
> Am i doing something
> wrong or this change is not allowed anymore?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jefferson Bauer
> 
>

_______________________________________________
mapserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users

_______________________________________________
mapserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users

Reply via email to