There is the FGS installer package (http://maptools.org/fgs/) for Linux. But it's still using version 5.0.2, as far as I know.

Christy

Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
exactly.
i built my own 5.2.0 too. But i'm not a system admin really and it's a bit of a hassle. If i were planning to compile my software myself i would use a different distro (Gentoo?). I've been posting some stuff on the ubuntu forums too, but i don't get too much response there. I guess that 5.2.0 doesn't get into lenny (and so ubuntu 8.10) because it hasn't been tested for long enough. It is still in the "experimental" repository (thanks nico mandery for pointing this out to me), so not even in "unstable" yet. And that will probably mean that we won't see any higher than 5.0.x in lenny - the stable debian versions for the next ±4 years. I know it's a choice for stability and security -- all about priorities, so nothing to make a fuss about -- but it's unconfortable nonetheless.

So lets try a different angle: if OSGeo are providing a package manager for windows (osgeo4w), why not provide a repository for Debian / Ubuntu and another one for RedHat / Fedora ? Easy for me to say of course, but doesn't it seem unfair that Windows should be favoured above open source OS's ?
(then, maybe i got it all wrong, so please correct me)

cheers,

WBL


    In my experiences with Fedora, they tend to keep the same version
    of MapServer that the OS version was released with (so Fedora 9
    has 5.0.2, or something like that, by default).  As I want to use
    the latest version, I build it for myself.  I bet that
    distributions tend to stay with what they had when first released
    for map compatibility reasons.  It would be something to discuss
    with your distributions package maintainers.


--
"Patriotism is the conviction that your country is superior to all others because you were born in it." - George Bernard Shaw
_______________________________________________
mapserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users

Reply via email to