All,
Sorry about the links in the previous Email (again), geez I don't know
what's going on at work, but here are the real links:
https://gis.ci.stpaul.mn.us/datasets/SHP/FED/USGS/USNG/mn_usng_lines_labels_2_public.map?mapext=503179.6728349806+111379.8994326578+508281.0020239575+135621.41573867595&mapsize=70+600&mode=map&MOOSETIME=1241653121858
https://gis.ci.stpaul.mn.us/datasets/SHP/FED/USGS/USNG/mn_usng_lines_labels_2b_public.map?mapext=503179.6728349806+111379.8994326578+508281.0020239575+135621.41573867595&mapsize=70+600&mode=map&MOOSETIME=1241653121858
bobb
Bob Basques wrote:
All,
Ok, I made some progress, sort of.
I started out here:
_/http://gis.ci.stpaul.mn.us/datasets/SHP/FED/USGS/USNG/mn_usng_lines_labels_2_public.map?mapext=503179.6728349806%20111379.8994326578%20508281.0020239575%20135621.41573867595&mapsize=70%20600&mode=map&MOOSETIME=1241653121858/_
<http://gis.ci.stpaul.mn.us/datasets/SHP/FED/USGS/USNG/mn_usng_lines_labels_2_public.map?mapext=503179.6728349806%20111379.8994326578%20508281.0020239575%20135621.41573867595&mapsize=70%20600&mode=map&MOOSETIME=1241653121858>
The three labels get justified ok horizontally in relation to each
other, but they don't line up vertically, which is what I'm after, so
. . .
I had a thought about using "ANGLE follow" instead of "ANGLE 0" and
then I get this:
_/http://gis.ci.stpaul.mn.us/datasets/SHP/FED/USGS/USNG/mn_usng_lines_labels_2b_public.map?mapext=503179.6728349806%20111379.8994326578%20508281.0020239575%20135621.41573867595&mapsize=70%20600&mode=map&MOOSETIME=1241653121858/_
<http://gis.ci.stpaul.mn.us/datasets/SHP/FED/USGS/USNG/mn_usng_lines_labels_2b_public.map?mapext=503179.6728349806%20111379.8994326578%20508281.0020239575%20135621.41573867595&mapsize=70%20600&mode=map&MOOSETIME=1241653121858>
Now the vertical alignment is nice and straight, but the OFFSETs are
ignored for the two outside (larger text) labels for the line. Should
the OFFSET parameter be ignored with "ANGLE follow"?
I could use this with three different images side by side, but it
would be nicer to just have one image . . . .
Thanks for any ideas . . . . Still putzing with it . . .
bobb
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
mapserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
_______________________________________________
mapserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
