Ticket #3033 (http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/3033) in case anyone is interested.
Steve >>> On 6/1/2009 at 10:11 AM, in message <[email protected]>, "Steve Lime" <[email protected]> wrote: > Not at the moment, no. The label cache rendering takes place independently of > layer drawing and > layer opacity isn't taken into account when labels are rendered. Probably > should be... I start a > ticket. Labels would need their own OPACITY keyword in this case or would > have to respect LAYER > OPACITY. > > Labels drawn independently of the cache, e.g. LABELPRECACHE ON are affected > by LAYER OPACITY > but are not subject to collision avoidance. > > Steve > >>>> On 6/1/2009 at 2:04 AM, in message >>>> <[email protected]>, > "David Nugent" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> While OPACITY [1-100] works fine for drawing features and symbols (ie. >> anything described in a STYLE section within the layer), it does not seem >> to affect labels. >> >> OPACITY does not appear to be a valid keyword in a LABEL section, so is >> there a way of achieving less than 100% opaque labels? >> >> Thanks, >> David >> _______________________________________________ >> mapserver-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users > > _______________________________________________ > mapserver-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
