Mlinden,

Thanks, did set the wfs_extent as I expected you to have suggested that . No succes.
Widened als Bart suggested, No succes.

It's doing something as the bounding box changes.

MArco

[email protected] schreef:
Do as Roy says.

Calculate (with a postgis query) the extent of ALL the features for the
given layer.
Use this extent to set the "wms_extent" (do not know if I name it
correctly, no access to my development machine at this moment).

This will help mapserver find objects.

What  version of mapserver are you using? Have you set the map extent and
layer extents?

Roy


  _____

From: DeDuikertjes [mailto:[email protected]]
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:12:29 +0200
Subject: [mapserver-users] WFS returning empty features

Dear List,

  I've mapserver all set up.
  The mapfile is working and produces a nice and working WMS.

  The WFS is giving me troubles.
  It returns a valid capabilities document with no warnings
  A getfeature request returns GML, with the bounds defined, but otherwise
  with NO features.
  This for a layer which draws perfectly well in the WMS.

  uDig sees all colums (attributes) of the layer, but every column is
empty.

  I've not a clue what I am doing wrong.

  any help greatly appreciated.

  MArco
  _______________________________________________
  mapserver-users mailing list
  [email protected]
  http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
    _______________________________________________
mapserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users



Milo van der Linden

<a href="http://somafm.com/";><img
src="http://somafm.com/linktous/450x25sfm1.gif"; alt="SomaFM" border=0
width=450 height=25 ></a>


_______________________________________________
mapserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
_______________________________________________
mapserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users

Reply via email to