Michael, can you describe the effect you're seeing? The change Alan refers to should cause you to see fewer labels but your original message leads me to believe that's not the case. If you remove that option with the 5.6 beta does the map look different?
Steve >>> Alan Boudreault <[email protected]> 10/01/09 10:49 AM >>> In fact, that ticket changed the label distance calculation. Before, only the distance between label1 point and label2 point was calculated. Now, the label size is taken into account for the distance calculation. So, we are now sure that there is really the "mindistance" value between our labels. Thanks, Alan On October 1, 2009 10:20:11 am Alan Boudreault wrote: > Hi, > > Could you check that ticket please: > http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/3050 > > Let me informed. > > Thanks, > Alan > > On October 1, 2009 10:12:57 am Steve Lime wrote: > > I'm not aware of any changes in that area of the code although something > > tells me there was a small change but will try and create a test case. > > Thanks for the testing... > > > > Steve > > > > >>> Michael Schulz <[email protected]> 09/30/09 5:32 AM >>> > > > > Hi, > > > > thanks for the 5.6 beta1. I'm pretty curious about the new mapfile > > xml-format. > > > > I have a mapfile that uses MINDISTANCE in label objects, the maps and > > labels are generated fine with mapserver- 5.4, with > > mapserver-5.6-beta1 the MINDISTANCE value seems not to be taken into > > account. Can anyone confirm this behaviour? > > > > Cheers, Michael > -- Alan Boudreault Mapgears http://www.mapgears.com _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
