Is there a reason why you can't organize your data as scale-dependent classes within one layer instead of as three separate layers in a group?
David. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 10:45 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [mapserver-users] WMS GetFeatureInfo beyond scale Hi list, I upgraded my UMN MapServer from version 5.0.2 to 5.4.0. Now I've got the following problem: For instance I am using a group of layers: LAYER NAME "A_a" GROUP "A" ... LAYER NAME "A_b" GROUP "A" ... LAYER NAME "A_c" GROUP "A" ... A_a, A_b and A_c are all the same data but represented at different scales. So e.g. at 1:100000 A_a becomes invisible and A_b becomes visible. But when I do a GetFeatureInfo request on UMN Mapserver in this case for query_layers=A I get back 3 responses (for A_a, A_b and A_c), but I would hope for only 1 response. It seem as if this is a well known problem (http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/842) What can I do beside upgrading on version 6.0 as soon as it's available? Any advice is welcome! Thanks in advance, Nina ________________________________________________________________ Neu: WEB.DE Doppel-FLAT mit Internet-Flatrate + Telefon-Flatrate für nur 19,99 Euro/mtl.!* http://produkte.web.de/go/02/ _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
