Frank Warmerdam wrote:
There isn't anything magical about 256.
256 or better raster scales sure are pretty though.... :) Seriously though, the raster data is floating point log data with relatively random spatial distribution. Short of making two images, one log float and one anti-log float, it would be nice to be able to scale on the fly without duplicating the original data. Duplication of rasters is O.K. if you have one or two, but once you near the 30k-40k files mark the disk space becomes a tad expensive. Would it be out of line to suggest some scaling functions like the generic math functions: log log10 sin asin sinh cos acos cosh tan atan tanh abs sqrt mod Peter _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
