On 02/07/2010 6:49 AM, Bart van den Eijnden wrote:
Hi list,
a follow-up on this e-mail from Daniel Morissette:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg08668.html
Is there still the plan to get the official stamp from OGC on WMS compliancy?
Any timeline?
Is there still work ongoing for WFS compliancy, or does this need sponsorship
to actually happen? Also, I assume it is technically viable to have Mapserver
WFS 1.1 compliant, or are there big / impossible hurdles to be taken?
There was some effort put toward wfs 1.1 compliancy tests with
several elements identified and corrected. Summary of this effort is
described here [1].
There is still substantial work to be done to be able to pass the
majority of the tests (things such addressing mandatory/non mandatory
attributes, support of Xpath expressions, support of the Sort operator,
encoding comes into mind). I believe there will still be some issues
with some of the tests that we found were inconsistent (although I have
not followed the details, note that CITE has done some work to
upgrade/correct the tests). There will be some effort toward this again
sometime before the 6.0 release.
[1]:
http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/wiki/MapServerOGCCITEComplianceWFS110Notes
best regards.
TIA.
Best regards,
Bart_______________________________________________
mapserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Assefa Yewondwossen
Software Analyst
Email: [email protected]
http://www.dmsolutions.ca/
Phone: (613) 565-5056 (ext 14)
Fax: (613) 565-0925
----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
mapserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
