Please... I'm assuming you are running against the most recent MapServer version. Even if there were issues with the 5.0 version we likely wouldn't patch it.
Steve -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of turtlewax Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 9:43 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [mapserver-users] Create new ticket for WCS RESPONSE_CRS & WCS BBOX? The WCS isn't behaving as I expect. I'll outline the symptoms below. I've issued requests against my own server, but also the server referenced in the documentation (http://maps.dnr.state.mn.us/cgi-bin/mapserv50). Should I open a ticket for this? EXAMPLE REQUEST http://wms/?Identifier=16&VERSION=1.1.0&FORMAT=image/tiff&SERVICE=WCS&REQUEST=GetCoverage&CRS=EPSG:3785&bbox=[.,.,.,]&resX=8&resY=8 ================================================ 1. I'm using the resX & resY parameters and requesting a geotiff. I've found that if I make a request and don't specify the RESPONSE_CRS, I get an image with good pixels, but bad SRS info. For example: GEOGCS["unnamed ellipse", DATUM["unknown",... ================================================ 2. If I do the same request and add "RESPONSE_CRS=<epsg:imagenative>", I get an image with good projection info. ================================================ 3. If I do the same request and add "RESPONSE_CRS=epsg:4326", or any projection other than the native projection, I get a 1X1 gray geotiff (with good projection info). ================================================ -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/WCS-error-Requested-BBOX-outside-requested-coverage-tp5282810p5292891.html Sent from the Mapserver - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
