Yes, the differences are significant: FastCGI seems to give speed
improvements from 20 to 100 %. I never guessed it would be that much: I
thought the Operating System itself cached the MapServer CGI program
between calls as part of its swapping policy, but FastCGI does this way
better.
Jan
On 09/01/10 12:35, Jeff McKenna wrote:
On 10-09-01 12:23 PM, Jan Hartmann wrote:
Are there any benchmarks for a comparison between MapServer CGI and
MapServer FastCGI?
Yes, see the graphs included in last year's FOSS4G WMS benchmarking
exercise:
http://www.slideshare.net/gatewaygeomatics.com/wms-performance-shootout
-jeff
_______________________________________________
mapserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
