Hi, Thanks for you help.
> Your process and the mapfile you sent were building a raster layer from > one single image file that was used through tileindex. Is this really > your situation? I think yes. What I want is to use tiled images because of the large image resolution. I saw in some posts that is possible to tile one .tif file into another .tif with small tiles of the original image. I tied to do that, but sincerely I dont know if what I'm doing is correct. I attached the debug files. I tested both situations one with tiled image and another without tiling and I dont see increased performance. I'm doing something wrong? It is expected to see a lot of increased performance? ms_error_with_tiling.txt have the debug of the image.tif with the tiles inside (created by gdaltranslate) ms_error_without_tiling.txt have the debug of the original image.tif without tiling. Angola_tiled_info.txt -> gdalinfo of the tiled image. angola1_info.txt -> gdalinfo of the original image used. http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/file/n5550112/Angola_tiled_info.txt Angola_tiled_info.txt http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/file/n5550112/angola1_info.txt angola1_info.txt http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/file/n5550112/ms_error_with_tiling.txt ms_error_with_tiling.txt http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/file/n5550112/ms_error_without_tiling.txt ms_error_without_tiling.txt -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/Raster-Display-Performance-tp4691679p5550112.html Sent from the Mapserver - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
