Hi Daniel, Good point. I've just been waiting for someone more proficient than me, who confirms that this approach makes sense ;-)
Best regards, Tamas 2011/5/16 Daniel Morissette <[email protected]> > On 11-05-14 03:21 PM, Tamas Szekeres wrote: > >> However the desired scale range (MINSCALEDENOM, MAXSCALEDENOM) could >> indeed be taken into account when accessing the source layers, by using >> a minor change. >> >> > If that's not the case already then I think MINSCALEDENOM, MAXSCALEDENOM > from the source layer should be taken into account by default with UNION > layers. i.e. when one sets up a layer with min/max scale, it is normally > because the data is not appropriate for use at other scales, so I see no > reason to expose via in the union layer outside of those scales either. > > My 0.02$ > > -- > Daniel Morissette > http://www.mapgears.com/ > Provider of Professional MapServer Support since 2000 > > > _______________________________________________ > mapserver-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users >
_______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
