A small one…. From: Tamas Szekeres [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 12:34 PM To: Lime, Steve D (DNR) Cc: Daniel Morissette; [email protected] Subject: Re: [mapserver-users] Re: Polygon layer with no fill shows line thumbnail in the legend image
That would be a good idea to define a feature for the legend icon per class. We should also be able to define a custom text attribute so that we could customize the text displayed for the annotation layers. I assume this would apply for a new RFC in practice. Best regards, Tamas 2011/6/22 Lime, Steve D (DNR) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> What about allowing the definition of a geometry (like inline features) using percentages. The defaults would be "as is" but could be overridden, kinda like the LEGENDICON class parameter. We could add a LEGENDFEATURE parameter... That would give folks a ton of control and by specifying coordinates in percentages things would scale. Steve -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Daniel Morissette Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 7:39 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [mapserver-users] Re: Polygon layer with no fill shows line thumbnail in the legend image Personally, I do not feel strongly either way, other than being hesitant to change something that's been in place for 8 years. Perhaps an option could be added to control the type of icon to generate? On 11-06-16 07:12 AM, Tamas Szekeres wrote: > Any update on this one? > > Tamas > > > > 2011/5/28 Tamas Szekeres <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>> > > Folks, > > According to a client's report, the current behaviour of drawing the > legend images may be confusing, as the polygon layer with no fill > shows line thumbnail (zigzag) in the legend image. > I've been tracking down the changes in SVN and came to the conlusion > that this behaviour has been introduced with > http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/changeset/2172 8 years ago. > > I'd be curious to know if this approach is satisfactory for all > users, or would it be more convenient to show an empty rectangle in > these cases? I would personally be in favour of drawing a rectangle > in order to make it clear that the layer type is polygon and not > line. Or is there any other reason that I'm not aware of, which > makes the current approach more compelling? > > > Best regards, > > Tamas > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > mapserver-users mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users -- Daniel Morissette http://www.mapgears.com/ Provider of Professional MapServer Support since 2000 _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
_______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
