Hello Jukka and Stephan, Thank you a lot for the pointer. Yes, version 1.0.0 definitely does the trick and I will use that instead. I got a big confused with the documentation and it was not too clear to me that was the behavior. Thank you!
As far as my original question for 16bit png (or jpeg) output, is there something that can be done about that? The tiff output files I get are too big for such a small area and it makes unusable for mobile devices. Thanks again, - Ragi > Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:46:37 +0100 > From: Stephan Mei?l <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [mapserver-users] 16 bit PNG or 16 bit jpeg output > To: Rahkonen Jukka <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <1326995197.2995.49.camel@io> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Hi, > > if you omit the mediatype parameter with version 2.0 you definitely get > back only the binary output as requested in the format parameter. In WCS > 1.1 afaik you always get back a multipart response and in WCS 1.0 always > only the binary. > > cu > Stephan > > > On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 17:16 +0000, Rahkonen Jukka wrote: > > Hi, > > > > No way, I mean the WCS version 1.0 as described in the very same > document http://www.mapserver.org/ogc/wcs_server.html > > > > -Jukka Rahkonen- > > > > > > ________________________________ > > LƤhettƤjƤ: Ragi Burhum [[email protected]] > > LƤhetetty: 19. tammikuuta 2012 19:02 > > Vastaanottaja: [email protected]; Rahkonen Jukka > > Aihe: Re: [mapserver-users] 16 bit PNG or 16 bit jpeg output > > > > Hi Jukka, > > > > I assume you mean WCS 2.0 and that you are referring to the MEDIATYPE > directive. The documentation at > http://mapserver.org/ogc/wcs_server.html#test-your-wcs-1-0-server said > that only "multipart/mixed" was allowed. Am I mistaken? > > > > Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:13:54 +0000 > > From: Rahkonen Jukka <[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> > > Subject: Re: [mapserver-users] 16 bit PNG or 16 bit jpeg output > > To: "'[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>'" > > <[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> > > Message-ID: > > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > > Hi, > > > > Could it be possible for you to use WCS 1.0.0 for avoiding the multipart > thing? > > > > -Jukka Rahkonen- > > > > ________________________________ > > Ragi Burhum wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am trying to output a single band 16bit png (or jpeg) output from a > Mapserver WCS service. > > > > I have tried the following output formats: > > > > OUTPUTFORMAT > > NAME jpeg > > DRIVER "GDAL/JPEG" > > MIMETYPE "image/jpeg" > > IMAGEMODE INT16 > > EXTENSION "jpg" > > FORMATOPTION "QUALITY=85" > > END > > > > OUTPUTFORMAT > > NAME GDALPNG > > DRIVER "GDAL/PNG" > > MIMETYPE "image/png" > > IMAGEMODE INT16 > > EXTENSION "png" > > FORMATOPTION "FILENAME=result.png" > > END > > > > When I try different IMAGEMODEs, I get the correct results, but for some > reason, INT16 does not work. I looked through the mailing list and I > noticed that this question has been asked before: > > > > http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/16-Bit-PNG-Output-td6249725.html > > > http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/Using-a-16-bit-per-band-PNG-image-td2490088.html > > > > I tried looking for a ticket in Trac, but I had no luck. Am I doing > something wrong? Perhaps I could accomplish this somehow with a custom gdal > driver? > > > > Also, a side question, if I wanted to make sure the replies from my WCS > getcoverage calls were not multipart (I am just interested in the binary > output), is there some mapserver-specific setting I can use to just get > that image as a reply instead of the accompanying xml files? > > > > Thanks! > > > > - Ragi >
_______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
