Hi Jukka, The REQUIRES element work this mode:
Layer2 is visible only when also Layer1 is in the request So a request like this: ...&layers=layer1,layer2 is visible layer1 + layer2 In a request like this: ...&layers=layer2 nothing is visible. Instead I need this other possibility: on a request ...&layers=layer2 the result visible is: Layer1 + Layer2 Thx, Andrea. 2012/5/29 Rahkonen Jukka <[email protected]> > ** > Hi, > > Layer2 should come always together with Layer1 If you put this line in > Layer2 definitions > > REQUIRES "[Layer1]" > > Without testing I cannot guarantee that I remember it right. For me the > logic of keyword "REQUIRES" feels reversed because my brain says that > Layer2 is rather required by Layer1. Perhaps native English speakers think > it is OK and explicit like it is now. > > -Jukka Rahkonen- > > > > ------------------------------ > Andrea Peri wrote: > Hi, > I'm using MapServer trunk version. > > Thx to Stephen Woodbridge response, > (http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/2012-May/072326.html) > > I'm able to avoid the use of a single layer of a group. > > Now I have another (perhaps) more complex question. > > I need to realize a map file with a configuration that > when the Layer1 is ligh-on from the user (using a wms request), the map > response will contains also another "Layer2". > > But I cannot use the "group" element because the two layers (Layer1 and > layer2) are not in the same group. > They are in two distinct and different groups. > > So I guess to allow this should be available a command like "requires", > but that force the light-on of Layer2 instead of deny the light-on of the > layer1. > > Is this available on mapServer ? > > thx, > > -- > ----------------- > Andrea Peri > . . . . . . . . . > qwerty àèìòù > ----------------- > > -- ----------------- Andrea Peri . . . . . . . . . qwerty àèìòù -----------------
_______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
