Thekla, can you open a ticket for this one please ? I'll try to have a look at it before the 6.2 release, but can't promise anything...
thanks, thomas On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Thekla Wirkus <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > last december 2011 Astrid wrote a mail about the behaviour of RESOLUTION and > DEFRESOLUTION. We tested again with MapServer > 6.2 and here are the results. The size of the symbols, texts and lines was > not like we expected. They were often too small. > > Have a look at the mail from 14. december 2011 > http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/2011-December/071077.html > > > We tested with MAP.RESOLUTION=288&MAP.DEFRESOLUTION=72, SIZEUNINTS Meters, > the scaled layers with SYMBOLSCALEDENOM 10000. > http://localhost/cgi-bin/mapserv62b1?map=/data/umn/resolution/map/resolution_test.map&MAP.RESOLUTION=288&MAP.DEFRESOLUTION=72"&VERSION=1.1.1&REQUEST=GetMap&SERVICE=WMS&LAYERS=notscaledPoint,scaledPoint,notscaledLine,scaledLine,notscaledPolygon,scaledPolygon,Polygon_with_symbols,notscaledLabel,scaledLabel&STYLES=,,,,,,,,&SRS=EPSG:31466&BBOX=2517600,5672315,2518960,5673675&WIDTH=2000&HEIGHT=2000&FORMAT=image/png&BGCOLOR=0xffffff&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&EXCEPTIONS=application/vnd.ogc.se_xml > > > The behaviour of MapServer 6.0 and MapServer 6.2 is just the same. This time > we have a demo project where we tried the different cases. You can download > it at: > > UMN: > > https://svn.wheregroup.com/download/mapserver_resolution.zip > > PDF: > https://svn.wheregroup.com/download/mapserver_resolution_pdf.zip > > > > Results: > > POINTS > * scaled or not scaled Points/Symbols: displayed correct, scaled and > notscaled are the same in the map > > LINES > * scaled lines: displayed correct > * unscaled lines: too small (1:2000, 1:5000, 1:1000), correct (1:20000) > > POLYGON > * scaled Polygone/Outline: displayed correct > * not scaled Polygone/Outline: too small (1:2000), correct (1:5000, > 1:10000,1:20000) > * scaled or not scaled Polygone with symbols: displayed correct > > LABEL > * scaled Label: too small > * not scaled Label: too big (1:1000, 1:2000, 1:5000, too small (1:20000) > > > For us it would be good to get this problem solved, as at the moment we > generate a copy of the mapfile for the print with symbol- and labelsize > multiplyed with factor 4. It would be charming to solve the print with one > mapfile. We could do testing and maybe I could look for sponsoring too. > > > > Is there someone else interested to solve this? Is there a ticket already? > > Thekla > > > > > On 14.12.2011 17:44, Astrid Emde wrote: > > Hello, > > we tried the parameter MAP.RESOLUTION AND MAP.DEFRESOLUTION with > MapServer 6.0.1 and made the following observations. > > We tested with RESOLUTION=288&MAP.DEFRESOLUTION=72 > > The size of the symbols and textes was not like we expected. They were > often too small. > > We tested with and without the parameter SYMBOLSCALEDENOM > > 1.) without SYMBOLSCALEDENOM (none scaled, fix size) ok are: > > * lines (not scaled) are dispayed correct (ok) > * outlines (not scaled) of polygones are dispayed correct (ok). > * symbols (not scaled) are displayed correct (ok). > * textes (not scaled) are displayed correct (ok).We tested not scaled > texts without SYMBOLSCALEDENOM: It's displayed different weather > MINSIZE/MAXSIZE is existing or not. > > > 2.) with SYMBOLSCALEDENOM > > NOT ok: > > * Scaled symbols are displayed incorrect - too small. > * Scaled lines are dispayed incorrect - too small. > * scaled outlines of polygones are dispayed incorrect. > * Scaled text are dispayed incorrect - too small. > > For us it would be good to get this problem solved, as at the moment we > generate a copy of the mapfile for the print with symbol- and labelsize > multiplyed with factor 4. It would be charming to solve the print with one > mapfile. We could do testing and maybe I could look for sponsoring too. > > Is there someone else interested to solve this? Is there a ticket already? > > Astrid > > thomas bonfort schrieb: > > cgi controls should do the trick? > > http://....../?SERVICE=WMS&....&MAP.RESOLUTION=144&MAP.DEFRESOLUTION=96 > > -- > thomas > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 17:43, Peter Hopfgartner > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Basically, I am looking for a way to something analogous to > > DEFRESOLUTION in > > a WMS request. The standard says, that a pixel is 0.28 mm x 0.28 mm > (25.4/0.28 ~= 90.71 DPI). I could not found a way to change this in the > > WMS > > 1.3.0 standard. > Is there a MapServer vendor parameter, similar to the one in GeoServer, > http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/user/services/wms/vendor.html#format-options > ? > > Peter > > -- > Peter Hopfgartner R3 GIS http://www.r3-gis.com > _______________________________________________ > mapserver-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users > > _______________________________________________ > mapserver-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users > > > -- > > > --------------------------------- > > Thekla Wirkus > GIS-Consultant > > ---------------------------------- > Aufwind durch Wissen! > > Qualifizierte OpenSource-Schulungen > bei der www.foss-academy.eu > ----------------------------------- > > WhereGroup GmbH & Co. KG > Eifelstraße 7 > 53119 Bonn > Germany > > Fon: +49 (0)228 / 90 90 38 - 34 > Fax: +49 (0)228 / 90 90 38 - 11 > > Email: [email protected] > www.wheregroup.com > Amtsgericht Bonn, HRA 6788 > ------------------------------- > Komplementärin: > WhereGroup Verwaltungs GmbH > vertreten durch: > Olaf Knopp, Peter Stamm > ------------------------------ > - > > Folgen Sie der WhereGroup auf twitter: http://twitter.com/WhereGroup_com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > mapserver-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users > _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
