On 12-07-30 12:49 PM, Daniel Morissette wrote: > On 12-07-30 11:37 AM, Jeff McKenna wrote: >> >> Thanks for your feedback. In fact at last year's WMS Benchmarking >> exercise with several software teams, we found that MapServer on Windows >> did very well vs Linux, and other mapping engines for that matter (don't >> just take my word for it, see the numbers at >> http://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/foss4g/benchmarking/wms/2011/presentation/). >> > > > Looking at the charts in the 2011 Benchmark presentations, it seems that > MapServer on Linux was more or less 3 times faster than the Windows > version in each chart. So my interpretation is that MapServer on Windows > is doing as well as the rest of the pack, but in those tests, MapServer > and Mapnik on Linux were still doing much better. Am I missing something? >
I really didn't want a public "x is better than y" war (especially since we are all on the same team) : I simply meant Windows did very well (I tried to use those exact words). Thank you for clarifying exact numbers. -jeff -- Jeff McKenna MapServer Consulting and Training Services http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/ _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
