Try it, it might work, I don't remember, but you still have the problem of invalidating the tiles when you changes the mapfile. But seriously, your approach seems a little haphazard. Also how often to you make mapfile changes? how did you deal with the invalidating cache problem before?

The big difference here is that mapcache is using mapserver as a WMS source and therefore it has to conform to the WMS rules.

Anyway, Thomas is the one that you would need to convince or fund if you want changes to the existing behavior. Meanwhile it would be worthwhile your time to figure out how it curently works before asking for features that might already exist. It has been a few months since I setup a mapcache instance and I know there have been changes that I'm not on top of in the newest release.

-Steve

On 9/19/2013 3:46 PM, Pablo Cecconi wrote:
The problem with that approach is that is the mapfile changes (a layer
is added or the default status of a layer changes) then I also have to
update mapcache config file. What i wonder is if there is a way to just
modify the map and have Mapcache reflecting that change.

Pablo


On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Stephen Woodbridge
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 9/19/2013 3:02 PM, Pablo Cecconi wrote:

        Hello,

        I've been a Mapserver user for many years now but I'm new to
        Mapcache
        and I'm not sure whether it's possible to replicate a particular
        TileCache setup using Mapcache.
        What we have today is a number of mapfiles (with Mapserver 5.4)
        set up
        as WMS-C layers served with TileCache. We're migrating to Mapserver
        6.2.1 and as it's incompatible with TileCache we expect to be
        able to
        replace it using Mapcache.
        In our current setup if I have a mapfile where a particular
        layer has
        STATUS OFF then TileCache will honor that status and not render
        the layer.
        I'd like to know whether it's possible to have MapCache work
        that way,
        that is, passing the map name as the LAYERS parameter of the WMS
        service
        and make it honor whatever STATUS a particular layer would have
        in the
        mapfile.


    I think the mapcache paradigm for this in mapcache works like this:

    tileset
       name=foo
       source=foo-source

    source
       name=foo-source
       map=/path/to/mapfile
       layers=layer1,layer2,layers3,.__..

    So you can configure which layers a tileset returns. I'm not sure
    how it deals with the status off, but it will work if you define the
    list explicitly. This also allow you to do this in the same mapcache.xml

    tileset
       name=foo2
       source=foo-source2

    source
       name=foo-source2
       map=/path/to/mapfile
       layers=streets,...
       transparent=true

    I do this a lot when I have a subset of data like streets that I
    want to render as an overly on a raster image

    -Steve W
    _________________________________________________
    mapserver-users mailing list
    [email protected].__org
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.osgeo.org/__mailman/listinfo/mapserver-__users
    <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users>



_______________________________________________
mapserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users

Reply via email to