Hi, You seem to use the name of the whole service "rastersample" in &layer=. That will mean that all layers on the service are requested. And then you control the 5 and 2 m layers by using min/maxgeowidth in layers. I have never tried such configuration myself but probably it should work. However, it is a bit hard to understand what really happens.
Could you comment out the min/maxgeowidth lines and make AutoCAD to use direct calls to 5 m and 2 m layers? Or have you already done it? If maxgeowidth works then your request with a big BBOX (wider than 8 km) should never start rendering from the 2 m layer "2013-12-23". More common way to do what you plan is to create a GROUP from 5 m and 2 m layers and control visibility with min/maxscaledenom. But I do not say that what you do is wrong, I have just never tried it. -Jukka Rahkonen- gom wrote: > Here is what I have done. I tweaked the extents of my Mapfile and now the > data is added to AutoCAD Map instantly. The changes are fairly small so it > doesn't seem logical that the change in total area is the culprit. Does this > suggest anything? > > New Extents > 496500.000 6237500.00 595000.000 6395500.000 > > Old Extents > 496500.000 6234300.00 597000.000 6401200.000 > > Jukka, I understand the point about better formats but the images are what > they > are. I have 20000+ 8 bit PNG images on the network and the format works very > well for other applications. The datasets expand all the time and > reprocessing > everything is not a viable option right now. > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/WMS- > Server-Optimization-tp5132723p5132950.html > Sent from the Mapserver - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > mapserver-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
