Yep that works. Staring blind for weeks you miss the simplest thing. So for the real conversion, can anyone advice what projection I should use, the simple epsg:28992 or the complex transformation. Seems there is a standard 100m shift in the epsg:28992
-- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Newbie-problem-mapfile-for-wgs84-based-on-epsg-28992-tp5195384p5195406.html Sent from the Mapserver - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
