I don't see why there would be problem, but are you using standard cgi or fastcgi? It seems like fastcgi would do that for you without having to run and maintain two cgi instances, but I probably don't understand your whole goal.
rich On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Andrea Peri <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > to try to have better usage resources I like to try a new > configuration using two distinct cgi mapservers each of them accessing > the same mapfile. > Both the cgi are in the same server with the mapfile. > > The goal is to avoid to have two distinct but identical mapfiles to > maintain. > > I guess should be no problem to have two cgi opening the same mapfile, > but any thought on this kind of configuration is welcome. > > Thx. > > -- > ----------------- > Andrea Peri > . . . . . . . . . > qwerty àèìòù > ----------------- > _______________________________________________ > mapserver-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users -- Richard W. Greenwood, PLS www.greenwoodmap.com
_______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
