That happened to me, for some reason the extent could not be computed by MS and it must be specified. But I can't tell what was the problem exactly. I have many other wfs on PG and the extent is well computed. If you have several layers in your mapfile,try to identify the layer that causes the problem, make sure the syntax is ok.
"Lime, Steve D (MNIT)" <[email protected]>@lists.osgeo.org Envoyé par : "mapserver-users" <[email protected]> 2015-12-30 17:42 A Michal Seidl <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> cc Objet Re: [mapserver-users] Is EXTENT on LAYER necessary for WFS with PostGIS It's not required, we have pg-based WFS services that run without that element. I believe you could see a performance boost under certain conditions if it doesn't have to be computed (e.g. large databases). --Steve -----Original Message----- From: mapserver-users [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michal Seidl Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 5:14 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [mapserver-users] Is EXTENT on LAYER necessary for WFS with PostGIS Hello, It looks like EXTENT parameter is necessary on LAYER level when trying to get data as WFS from PostGIS with CONNECTION postgis driver. The problem is that data in DB is changing and how to update mapfile? Thanks Michal -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Is-EXTENT-on-LAYER-necessary-for-WFS-with-PostGIS-tp5243162.html Sent from the Mapserver - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
_______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
