you need to include in your QUERY_STRING=MAP=....&

it is probably hard coded in the fcgi config.

-Steve W


On 7/22/2020 7:15 PM, English Paul wrote:

So you have a complex historical "mess" and its not clear where the performance issue is. So you need to divide the problem into small problems that you can verify are or are not contributing. I would start with something like this:

Thank you – I would not have thought to try it outside of CGI entirely!

Take one slow image request and try that as cgi or cli and not fcgi and turn on debugging.

  - copy and rename you mapfile so it doesn't mess with the production requests

Not a major worry in this case – I’m working in an entirely dev environment. I did make backup copies though!

  - turn on the debugging and send it to stderr in the debug mapfile

 - you can manually run that image request from the commandline like:

if mapserv is not in your path you might need to find it and your the path to it below

mapserv -nh QUERY_STRING="everything after the ? in the original query" >junk.png 2>error.txt

-nh suppresses headers from being output before the image data

error.txt will be stderr output and should contain the debug messages

I couldn’t quite get there – which this is what I ended up running:

# /usr/libexec/mapserv -nh QUERY_STRING="FORMAT=image%2Fpng&LAYERS=winter1km_5min&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&SERVICE=WMS&VERSION=1.1.1&REQUEST=GetMap&STYLES=&TIME=2020-07-22T22%3A30%3A00Z&SRS=EPSG%3A900913&BBOX=-11584184.507886,4070118.8849183,-11271098.44003,4383204.9527744&WIDTH=256&HEIGHT=256" > junk.png 2>error.txt

I first tried it with our current map file(s), and then with MS_ERRORFILE set to stderr and DEBUG set to 5, in both cases, I got an empty error.txt, and the following in junk.png:

Content-type: text/html

<HTML>

<HEAD><TITLE>MapServer Message</TITLE></HEAD>

<!-- MapServer version 6.0.1 OUTPUT=GIF OUTPUT=PNG OUTPUT=JPEG OUTPUT=KML SUPPORTS=PROJ SUPPORTS=AGG SUPPORTS=CAIRO SUPPORTS=FREETYPE

SUPPORTS=ICONV SUPPORTS=FRIBIDI SUPPORTS=WMS_SERVER SUPPORTS=WMS_CLIENT SUPPORTS=WFS_SERVER SUPPORTS=WFS_CLIENT SUPPORTS=WCS_SERVER SU

PPORTS=SOS_SERVER SUPPORTS=FASTCGI SUPPORTS=THREADS SUPPORTS=GEOS INPUT=POSTGIS INPUT=OGR INPUT=GDAL INPUT=SHAPEFILE -->

<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">

loadMap(): Web application error. CGI variable &quot;map&quot; is not set.

</BODY></HTML>

I noticed that if I ran it with just -nh, I get the following:

#/usr/libexec/mapserv -nh

This script can only be used to decode form results and

should be initiated as a CGI process via a httpd server.

So maybe this older version just really doesn’t want to be run on the CLI? Or maybe I’m messing up the QUERY_STRING, or need to set the CGI variable to something as the junk.png output suggests?

Thanks again and thanks SO MUCH for the super quick reply!!

Paul

On 7/22/2020 1:47 PM, English Paul wrote:

    Hi,

       Newbie here, just got a work assignment to look into some
    performance issues with mapserver-6.0.1-3_0.el6.x86_64 –
    specifically, at one time, it rendered radar images very fast,
    then it degraded and seemed to consume a lot more CPU. So – the
    EC2 instance side was upgraded significantly – and it still
    performs badly and uses a lot of CPU. It also seems to be getting
    slowly worse over time (days/months, not seconds/minutes). I asked
    this on IRC, but it looks like email might be a better route.

      During all of this, the same mapserver instance renders
    satellite images quickly. These seem to be a similar, or in some
    cases larger size png to start with, rendered onto the same final
    map/size.

      So – the obvious answer is that it isn’t using the CPU to
    render/re-render, but rather spending it on something else – I/O
    most likely – eg: a network request, disk I/O, SQL query?

      The previous person working on it tried turning on debug at
    various levels – but unfortunately that made it even slower,
    making it tricky to answer “what is making it slow when debug is
    turned off?”

     My first instinct was to try an strace and nothing was obvious.
    Next up – a flame graph from strace, and/or trying dtrace – but my
    understanding is that dtrace is a little weak on
    RHEL/CentOS/Amazon Linux 6.0 **and** I’m not particularly good at
    that. Also, we’re using fcgi, so attaching to the correct process
    is a bit tricky.

      My next instinct was to look at release notes and see if the
    current stable has anything fixes/improvements that directly
    address this – there aren’t any that are obvious to my eyes, but
    you developers have been busy! So many things! Including some
    performance fixes and one “significant” performance fix.

    Current config file:

    AddHandler fcgid-script fcgi

    FcgidIPCDir /var/run/mod_fcgid

    FcgidProcessTableFile /var/run/mod_fcgid/fcgid_shm

    FcgidMaxProcesses 10

    FcgidMaxProcessesPerClass 10

    FcgidMaxRequestInMem 196608

    FcgidInitialEnv PROJ_LIB /usr/share/proj

    FcgidInitialEnv LD_LIBRARY_PATH "/usr/local/lib:/usr/pgsql-9.1/lib"

    So – suggestions for my next move? I currently plan to take a
    quick swing at building 7.6 for RHEL 6.0, knowing there might be
    old libraries and whatnot that make that a non-starter. Of course
    – we’ve got other infra running on this same instance, so
    upgrading everything is a much bigger task.

     Strace flame graph?

      Stretch and try dtrace?

      A better way to use debug?

      Something else I’m missing – eg: differences between the image
    types that make them perform so differently?

    Thanks,

    Paul



    _______________________________________________

    mapserver-users mailing list

    [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>

    https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users


_______________________________________________
mapserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
_______________________________________________
mapserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users

Reply via email to