No, this is too complex. And Steve's runtime-substutions with %path% in
de URL probably does not work. I don't see how that could be done in
PHP-MapScript.
On 06/12/2023 21:23, Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
Hi,
Or write the DATA with full-path into an INCLUDE file if there are
loads of mapfiles using the same paths. Then there would be much less
editing when the paths change.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
*Lähettäjä:* MapServer-users <[email protected]>
*Puolesta *Lime, Steve D (MNIT) via MapServer-users
*Lähetetty:* keskiviikko 6. joulukuuta 2023 21.59
*Vastaanottaja:* [email protected]; Steve Lime <[email protected]>
*Kopio:* [email protected]
*Aihe:* Re: [MapServer-users] multiple shapepaths
IMHO, if you do a SHAPEPATH at the layer level then you might as well
just add the full-path to the DATA element. You’re not really gaining
anything with the additional complexity. Did the idea of using runtime
variables not pan out?
*From:*MapServer-users <[email protected]> *On
Behalf Of *Jan Hartmann via MapServer-users
*Sent:* Wednesday, December 6, 2023 1:14 AM
*To:* Steve Lime <[email protected]>
*Cc:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [MapServer-users] multiple shapepaths
How about a shapepath at the layer level? I am combining 20 years of
working with old maps in three (or four :-)) different countries
(Netherlands, Germany and Flemish and Walloon Belgium), all in their
own formats, projections, directories an servers. It would help to
keep my applications (and my mind) clear if I could use the
appropriate shapepaths. And as to portability, it is essential to use
relative paths. Just try to move a website to a new server with a
differently named filesystem, if all paths are hard coded.
Jan
Op 5 dec 2023 om 15:43 heeft Steve Lime <[email protected]> het
volgende geschreven:
It won’t work. A configuration is loaded in entirety first, and
then applied as necessary.
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 7:21 AM Jan Hartmann via MapServer-users
<[email protected]> wrote:
Not sure. I cannot get it working anyway. Any ideas, Steve?
On 04/12/2023 10:10, Jörg Thomsen (WhereGroup) via
MapServer-users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not sure, but perhaps overwriting it, would work?
>
> MAP
>
> shapepath 'blah'
>
> Layer 1
> Layer 2
>
> shapepath 'blubb'
>
> Layer 3
> Layer 4
>
> Jörg
>
>
>
> Am 02.12.23 um 19:32 schrieb Jan Hartmann via MapServer-users:
>> Yes, that is what I sought, didn't know it was possible.
Thanks!
>>
>> Jan
>>
>> On 02/12/2023 19:29, Steve Lime wrote:
>>> One other thought, you can use multiple paths via runtime
subs to
>>> approximate what I think you’re looking for, so:
>>>
>>> WEB
>>> VALIDATION
>>> path1_default “/opt/path1”
>>> path1 “^\/opt\/path1$”
>>> path2_default “/opt/path2”
>>> path2 “^\/opt\/path2$”
>>> END
>>> END
>>>
>>> Then in DATA values you’d use %path1% or %path2%. This is
another
>>> use case for variables that was suggested recently. We could,
>>> perhaps, define a way to mark something as immutable via
url so the
>>> regex could be simplified and only the default would ever
be used
>>> (e.g. “path2” “immutable”).
>>>
>>> —Steve
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:28 PM Steve Lime
<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Nope, just the one value.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 1:02 PM Jan Hartmann via
MapServer-users
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is it possible to use multiple paths in a shapepath?
>>> ./data1:./data2
>>> does not work
>>>
>>> Jan
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MapServer-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MapServer-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
>
_______________________________________________
MapServer-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
_______________________________________________
MapServer-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
