+1 for Mapserver and I agree with Brian on recommending a new name for MapServer Enterprise.
Todd Brenningmeyer SAIC - EEMG 8421 St. John Industrial Drive St. Louis, MO 63114 Phone: (314) 770-3097 Fax: (314) 344-4349 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: UMN MapServer Users List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 9:16 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] Keeping MapServer MapServer (Re: Will someone summarize this?) +1 Also, +1 on recommending the MapServer Enterprise project chooses a different (unique) name. Brian Fischer Houston Engineering, Inc. Maple Grove, MN (763) 493-4522 -----Original Message----- From: UMN MapServer Users List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fawcett, David Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 9:10 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] Keeping MapServer MapServer (Re: Will someone summarize this?) +1 -----Original Message----- From: UMN MapServer Users List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kralidis,Tom [Burlington] Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 9:07 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] Keeping MapServer MapServer (Re: Will someone summarize this?) +1 > -----Original Message----- > From: UMN MapServer Users List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff McKenna > Sent: Thursday, 01 December, 2005 10:04 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] Keeping MapServer > MapServer (Re: Will someone summarize this?) > > > I'd like to have a small voice as well: as a mapserver user and > documenter, I vote for "MapServer". > > jeff > > > Sean Gillies wrote: > > On Dec 1, 2005, at 7:33 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote: > > > >> On 12/1/05, Aniruddha S. Khadkikar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> Have we agreed that: > >>> > >>> Mapserver retain its identity as before (I vote for that > - in case > >>> polling is on). > >> > >> > >> Aniruddha, > >> > >> I, for one, don't agree with keeping MapServer named just > >> "MapServer". Clearly a number of people do feel this way. > > > > > > Frank, > > > > I think it's clear as can be made without packing us all in a room > > and > > asking for a show of hands: outside of the foundation cabal (and > > perhaps AU attendees) people want the original MapServer to remain > > "MapServer". Do you not see this? > > > > Let's make it so. It's the right thing to do. > > > > cheers, > > Sean >
