+1
Fawcett, David wrote: >+1 > >-----Original Message----- >From: UMN MapServer Users List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of Kralidis,Tom [Burlington] >Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 9:07 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] Keeping MapServer MapServer (Re: Will >someone summarize this?) > > >+1 > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: UMN MapServer Users List >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff McKenna >>Sent: Thursday, 01 December, 2005 10:04 >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] Keeping MapServer >>MapServer (Re: Will someone summarize this?) >> >> >>I'd like to have a small voice as well: as a mapserver user and >>documenter, I vote for "MapServer". >> >>jeff >> >> >>Sean Gillies wrote: >> >> >>>On Dec 1, 2005, at 7:33 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>On 12/1/05, Aniruddha S. Khadkikar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Have we agreed that: >>>>> >>>>>Mapserver retain its identity as before (I vote for that >>>>> >>>>> >>- in case >> >> >>>>>polling is on). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>Aniruddha, >>>> >>>>I, for one, don't agree with keeping MapServer named just >>>>"MapServer". Clearly a number of people do feel this way. >>>> >>>> >>>Frank, >>> >>>I think it's clear as can be made without packing us all in a room >>>and >>>asking for a show of hands: outside of the foundation cabal (and >>>perhaps AU attendees) people want the original MapServer to remain >>>"MapServer". Do you not see this? >>> >>>Let's make it so. It's the right thing to do. >>> >>>cheers, >>>Sean >>> >>> > >!DSPAM:438f0ac0208202031015366! > > > > -- Please avoid sending me Word, Excel or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
