Bruce Momjian wrote:
Where are we on this? Can we get it added to our web site? Can we have
usernames added to the map?
Hi,
yes, both can be done. But our server and connectivity are sort of slow,
so I was talking to some people whether they could host the services.
This will take a few more days. Anybody interested in operating a
spatial data infrastructure on stable servers (preferrably FreeBSD or
some Linux) with good connectivity feel free to contact us.
Additionally we got lost in a few technical discussions about whether to
implement the full scale service oriented standardized I-can-add-myself
version using PostgreSQL with PostGIS (which I would really like to see
as it promotes using PG as spatial data backend and also gives us GIS
guys a chance to show off cool technology).
Claire favored an easy-to-use google-maps approach which would mean less
effort getting to run (they have it all up and running) but less
compatibility and unsolved copyright issues regarding the background maps.
Give us a few more days, by the weekend I will post a link so that
people can have a look at it. The link will ship with a list of which
software is being used and how it is configured. Ideally someone "near"
the PostgreSQL homepage could operate the service (we GIS folks never
stop considering spatial proximity).
What has to be done anyway is collect the coordinates of the users. It
would be nice to not start off with a blank map. We can provide some 20
users in Germany (most of them spatial). Either the name of a city or
the decimal degree coordinates of the position will do.
Best, Arnulf.
Arnulf Christl wrote:
Claire McLister wrote:
Good point. This might actually be a problem. Google Maps API requires
each server that is serving the map to be registered with Google, and
send the corresponding key when making the Javascript request.
Unless the mirrors can each send their own keys, this will not work.
Claire
Hi, more cross posting...
Sounds like this task should be solved using WMS and WFS services.
Google is cool but in order to foster both Open Source and standards
(OGC) we would suggest to use e.g. MapServer as WMS to produce the maps
and GeoServer as WFS to manage geomtries. Those OWS services could then
be included in any OWS client, web interface, etc. Everything is there
and ready to go, the effort to get it to run should be minimal.
Our clients usually operate PostgreSQL databases with several million
geometries - those 500 to 600 markers could be hosted on any
antediluvian box and still be fast. You will know what to about
mirroring, we would probably suggest to implement P2P - read Ward
Cunninghams ideas int he keynote at the Wikimania conference this summer...
We have done the user mmapping Mapbender users with tooltips, direct
link to the website, etc. You can have a look at it on the project
homepage http://www.mapbender.org
Its done Wiki-style so that users can enter their own position (use the
blue flag) or remove or edit any position (use the i-button). No user
accounts yet but security and authentication is in place and have just
not yet been necessary (still waiting for spatial spam...)
We will spread word about spatial data management using
PostgreSQL/PostGIS with MapServer, GeoServer etc. at the
http://www.opendbcon.net (database fundamentals) on Nov. 8. and 9. in
Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
This idea is on short notice but i would be really very excited if i
could show the map there! We suggest the following alterantive actions:
- It should be easy to add a geometry_column to the existing PostgreSQL
database which alredy has the positions. Add a GeoServer WFS to access
the geomtry and a MapServer for WMS display.
- Alternatively send Paolo or us or both the geo-positions and we add
them to our existing OWS infrastructure (that will takt a few hours of
work only).
Beause there is not so much time until the conference this would just be
be a prototype which should in the long run move to the PostgreSQL or
PostGIS homepage or Wiki or both. Yet another idea: Mediawiki (the
Wikipedia software) is also right now introducing geometries to the Wiki
database - obviously also using PostgreSQL/PostGIS. This would be
another cool multiplier.. and there we also meet with Google again.
Best, Arnulf.
On Oct 26, 2005, at 6:02 PM, Robert Treat wrote:
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 18:24, Claire McLister wrote:
On Oct 26, 2005, at 2:08 PM, Brent Wood wrote:
There has recently been a thread on the Postgres user list about a web
based postgres user/developer map. Claire has built a Google map based
system, getting locations from IP addresses.
Just so people know, this map can be found at:
http://www.zeesource.net/maps/map.do?group=456
I'm going to loop in a few more people here :-), namely the pg web
team who
will probably be able to give pointers on site integration. One thing
to keep
in mind is that the postgresql website is statically mirrored onto a
number
of different servers, so any solution we come up with will ideally allow
itself to that. I believe a google maps system can do this (we can
mirror the
javascript code and the location/data file on all mirrors and the
google map
will work with it as is), which is why I originally went with that
type of
solution.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
_______________________________________________
Freegis-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://intevation.de/mailman/listinfo/freegis-list
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
