Puneet & Blaise, Thank you for your feedback. I test with Firefox and IE, but have never tried a KHTML-based browser (either Safari or Konqueror). I didn't realize that Gecko was more forgiving of non-standard HTML than KHTML, that's great to know. I don't have access to a Mac, and while the site is served on a Linux server, I don't have a local linux box where I could conveniently test on Konqueror. Is there a KHTML-based browser that runs on Windows that you'd recommend?
Unfortunately, my html is old and in table hell, but getting the site to work on KHTML browsers will be a nice long-term goal. Cheers, -Emilio On 3/12/06, Puneet Kishor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 12, 2006, at 10:03 AM, blaise wrote: > > > Same, nice work Emilio, but same, on a my linux box, it displays well > > in > > Mozilla and Firefox, but the image is misplaced in Konqueror. > > Makes sense. Safari is based on KHTML, the basis for Konqueror. Emilio, > keep in mind, for most every part, Safari is totally standards > compliant. So are Gecko-based browsers (Mozilla, Firefox, Camino, > etc.), but they may be more forgiving of non-standard html. I could be > very wrong in this, but generally if it works in Safari, it is > standards-compliant, and will likely work in other standards-compliant > browsers. There are a few Safari (Webkit) specific features, but they > degrade gracefully (although the validation service complains). > > > > > On Sunday 12 March 2006 13:00, Puneet Kishor wrote: > >> Hi Emilio, > >> > >> Nice work. Some feedback from the Mac side... looks nice in Camino, > >> but > >> the image is misplaced in Safari. The image shows up in the top left > >> corner of the browser instead of in the image box. Hope you can fix > >> that. > >> > >> Puneet. > Puneet Kishor
