I agree Tom, I think MapServer should be picking up the
ColorMapEntry/@label when doing raster legends.  Is there plans for
this?  

Cheers,

Joost  

-----Original Message-----
From: UMN MapServer Users List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 8:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] MapServer SLD RasterSymbolizer

 
Sorry, meant one ColorMap per Rule :)

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: UMN MapServer Users List on behalf of Kralidis,Tom
[Burlington] 
        Sent: Sat 22-Jul-06 11:01 
        To: [email protected] 
        Cc: 
        Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] MapServer SLD
RasterSymbolizer
        
        


        The OGC:SLD 1.0.0 schema allows for one ColorMap element with 0
or more ColorMapEntry elements.
        
        MapServer typically picks up Rule/Name and applies them as a
legend title.  For rasters, because of the way the schema is defined, I
think MapServer should be picking up ColorMapEntry/@label when doing
raster legends, but then what happens when someone creates a Rule/Name
value earlier?
        
        ..Tom
        
        
        
                -----Original Message-----
                From: UMN MapServer Users List on behalf of Van Ulden,
Joost
                Sent: Fri 21-Jul-06 18:57
                To: [email protected]
                Cc:
                Subject: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] MapServer SLD
RasterSymbolizer
               
               
        
                Hi all,
               
                I am unsure how the raster symbolizer is supposed to
work in MapServer.  Do I create one Rule in the SLD with one ColorMap
that has one or more ColorMapEntries?  Or can I create a rule for each
ColorMapEntry? Either way works (works using a filter too!!!) but
ColorMapEntries can't be given a name.  It is preferable from my point
of view to create a rule for each ColorMapEntry so that a decent legend
can be generated.
               
                Thoughts anyone?
               
                Joost
               
        
        

Reply via email to