On 8/16/06, Thy, Kristian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I strongly agree with the AJAX and Web 2.0 arguments. And since was said that MapServer currently generates little HTML code that's one more reason to make the change.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kralidis,Tom [Burlington]
> I like some sort of XHTML (I prefer strict, but can ease up a
> little). I wonder what others on this list use.
XHTML1.0 Transitional. As long as valid XHTML can be generated,
the specific dialect matters little to me. But it would be nice
to be able to generate valid XHTML since
that makes for easier
AJAX scripting and general "web two dot oh"-iness ;-)
I strongly agree with the AJAX and Web 2.0 arguments. And since was said that MapServer currently generates little HTML code that's one more reason to make the change.
regards,
Kristian
This email and any attached files are confidential and copyright protected. If you are not the addressee, any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. Unless otherwise expressly agreed in writing, nothing stated in this communication shall be legally binding.
--
"Minds are like parachutes, they work best when open."
Bruno Patini Furtado
Software Developer
webpage: http://bpfurtado.net
software development blog: http://bpfurtado.livejournal.com
