+1. I think they would be very complimentary, as a GeoServer WFS-T instance would have different access control rules than that of a WMS, so you can set them up at separate URLs, and operating on the same underlying data.
..Tom > -----Original Message----- > From: UMN MapServer Users List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Lime > Sent: 12 February, 2007 3:01 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] MapServer Vs > GeoServer...WFS-T support > > It's not like one can't use multiple tools... ;-) > > Steve > > >>> Carola Jesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2/12/2007 8:06:20 AM >>> > I am sorry to hear that! Would have been to nice.... > Carola > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Carola Jesch > Wetland Biogeochemistry Institute > Department of Oceanography and Coastal Science Louisiana > State University > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: UMN MapServer Users List > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gerry Creager > > Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 7:04 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] MapServer Vs GeoServer > > > > Aw, man! That's too bad. I've some interesting uses for WFS-T! > > > > gerry > > > > Tim Bowden wrote: > > > On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 01:20 -0600, Jedi Knight wrote: > > >> Will MapServer support for WFS-T ? > > >> Thanks! > > > > > > There are no plans to do so. See: > > > > > > http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/docs/howto/wfs_server/#to-do-items-and-kn > > > > own-limitations > > > > > > > > > Tim Bowden > > > > -- > > Gerry Creager -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University > > Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.862.3983 > > Office: 1700 Research Parkway Ste 160, TAMU, College Station, TX > 77843 > > >
