One big difference is that Geoserver supports WFS-T, i.e. transactional WFS, and Mapserver does not.
Mapserver is not very efficient against database sources for WFS (uses 1 SQL statement per feature retrieved), Geoserver does much better in that area. This is especially true for attribute queries in WFS.
And ofcourse there is the technology difference, CGI versus J2EE, which could influence a decision. Sometimes I meet organizations who don't want CGI's, but ofcourse have no problem with J2EE.
Best regards, Bart Gary Watry schreef:
Can anyone tell the strong points of using either MapServer or GeoServer
-- Bart van den Eijnden OSGIS, Open Source GIS [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.osgis.nl _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
NotesDocAssentor.NOTE
Description: Binary data
