Try the idiom below for the class breakouts. This will give you one layer, with multiple classes, instead of 5 layers from the same data. Order the CLASS definitions so that the most common class is listed first. I believe (but don't know for sure) that your present definition causes all of the geometry to be read 5 times (once for each layer).

I think you can pull the CLASS MINSCALE/MAXSCALE up to the LAYER level. Not sure what improvement that would have though.

One other thing I would suggest is preprocessing your EXPRESSION line. Instead of computing it on the fly based on LOWER and UPPER, compute a new column when the DBF is generated, which is 1 for -98 to -104, 2 for -94 to -98, etc.

If this is not enough, consider creating two different levels of polygon data, one coarse (for small scales) and one fine (for large scales). This step made a big difference for me.

Hal

  # ==============================================
  # Layer: Propagations
  # ==============================================
  LAYER
    GROUP "Propagations"
    NAME "all propagations"
    STATUS DEFAULT
    TILEINDEX "propagations/tileindex"
    TILEITEM "location"
    TYPE POLYGON
    # --------------------------------------------------
    # Class: -98db to -104db
    # --------------------------------------------------
    CLASS
      NAME "-98db to -104db"
      EXPRESSION ([LOWER] >= -104 AND [UPPER] <= -98)
      MINSCALE 0
      MAXSCALE 1200000
      STYLE
        COLOR 255 128 0
        OUTLINECOLOR 255 128 0
      END
    END

    # --------------------------------------------------
    # Class: -94db to -98db
    # --------------------------------------------------
    CLASS
      NAME "-94db to -98db"
      EXPRESSION ([LOWER] >= -98 AND [UPPER] <= -94)
      MINSCALE 0
      MAXSCALE 1200000
      STYLE
        COLOR 0 0 255
        OUTLINECOLOR 0 0 255
      END
    END

[continue the class definitions...]

  END

--
Hal Mueller                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile Geographics LLC     http://www.mobilegeographics.com/

Reply via email to