I've always used Multiple Fields Labels - using [NAME] and [ALTERNATE NAME] 
fields for the ccStreet.cdf layer. (I can't use the Navteq streets because they 
don't align well with Census Blocks.)

The labels look like this:


 Main St
 US Hwy 1
___________


The problem I'm having is that, when a street doesn't have anything in the 
[Alternate Name] field, Maptitude 2013 displays two dashes for the [Alternate 
Name] field like this:

   Oak St
    _ _
_____________


...which puts the street name far from the street line. 

When a street has no name, each segment is labeled like this:

    _ _
    _ _
_____________

...which increases clutter dramatically.


Does anyone have any ideas for supressing the dashes?

If I remember correctly, previous Maptitude versions didn't show the dashes and 
would collapse into a null [ALTERNATE NAME] field.

One temporary solution that I have found is this:

Export ccStreet.cdf for the map area to a .dbd file.

Add a field called NamePlusAltName.

For streets with no alternate name, fill the field with the [LABEL] field.

For streets with alterate names, fill the field with the formula: LABEL + " / " 
+ Proper([ALTERNATE NAME]).

That works fine but it is a lot of extra steps for every mapping project. If I 
could process the entire street database, that would work but but it bombed out 
at 36%  with dberr 909  and dberr 19 (I'm guessing a file size or record 
limitation). I may try again by breaking up the files but would be very 
receptive to alternative ideas.




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Maptitude/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Maptitude/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to