On 7/2/11 10:30 PM, "Barry Leiba" <[email protected]> wrote:
>We've added the subject draft as a working-group item, and I've >incorporated all the feedback so far. > >> This document defines a new Abuse Reporting Format (ARF) feedback >> report type value: "not-spam". It can be used to report a >>message >> that was mistakenly marked as spam. >> >> A URL for this Internet-Draft is: >> >>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-marf-not-spam-feedback-00. >>txt > >J.D., does this satisfy your concerns about the tone? And Brett, I've >added a DKIM signature to the example (thanks, Murray), and included a >note about that and a pointer to the security considerations. Thanks Barry (and Murray). > >Are there any other comments on this? Not from me. > Or are we already set to go >now? Reviews, please. _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
