The chairs would like to see some progress on the documents the group is working on. The group is still in the middle of a lot of work -- let's look at getting it done, please.
** draft-ietf-marf-reporting-discovery-01 JD posted this version on 27 July, and there have been no comments. JD, what do you consider the status of this version to be? Do you think it needs more work, or is it ready to go? Everyone else, please review this version and post comments, or let us know that you've reviewed it and you think it's ready. Then there's the four-way split: ** draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report-01 This has had the most recent action. Hilda posted this version on 9 August, and Murray posted his comments on 18 August, here: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf/current/msg01245.html Resolving Murray's comments will require another draft version. But in his message, he also asked some chair questions; we need feedback on this, so Hilda can do an -02 version that can go into working group last call. ** draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting-01 Scott posted this version on 11 July. Murray commented here: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf/current/msg01248.html Again, there are some questions in Murray's comments; please give your input. Scott, what do you consider the status of this version to be? ** draft-ietf-marf-dkim-reporting-02 Murray posted this version on 15 May. There've been no comments at all. Has anyone looked at it? Do we think we have the split right, and have the right bits been split out of it? ** draft-ietf-marf-redaction-00 JD posted the first working-group version on 6 April. The only comment so far is from Murray, who thinks it's ready. We need more reviews. JD, do you think this version is ready, or do you intend to post a revision? Others, please review and comment, or let us know that you think it's done. Finally, we have this one pending: ** draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00 JD posted this on 13 May, and there's been little substantive said about it. It's how we plan to address the charter item that coincides with MAAWG's feedback loop document (draft-jdfalk-maawg-cfblbcp). Is this the path the WG wants to take? Shall we adopt this as a WG document, and proceed with it? Reviews and comments, please. Barry, as chair _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
