In <[email protected]>, on
09/01/2011
at 12:22 PM, "J.D. Falk" <[email protected]> said:
>I believe we covered that in marf-base, but I wouldn't be opposed to
>saying it again. Can you suggest some appropriate language?
Whoops! I sent suggested language for an unrelated item. The test I
suggest for this item is a new paragraph in 1. Introduction
While it is desirable for network operators to accept
complaints at abuse and Postmaster mailboxes in MARF
format, they MUST continue to accept and process plain
text abuse reports those mailboxes.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
