> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Shmuel Metz > Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 4:26 AM > To: Message Abuse Report Format working group > Subject: Re: [marf] Private vs. "public" FBLs > > I parse whois data with Perl regexen, and IMHO the data are still far > too unstandardized, e.g., some addresses are present only in comments, > some data are available only by following links whose existence > depends on the particular RIR.
That's my observation as well. I believe it's the case that any reliability people see from WHOIS is coincidental, and not the result of any standards effort from IETF or a policy effort from ICANN. _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
